Posts by Daniel Greer

Media Misinterprets Wisconsin Result

Posted by |

Republicans are as interested in suppressing votes, as the media is in suppressing their liberal bias, that is to say, not at all.

The latest fake “suppressed voters” narrative involves the recent Wisconsin primary, wherein Wisconsin Republicans fought and defeated a bum rush on the rule of law.

And, while Democrats won the battle of a single Supreme Court seat, the war over balloting integrity was preserved by Republican lawmakers standing their ground.

Nationwide, Democrats have been desperately angling to scale California’s ballot harvesting to all states. They’ve failed to do so through Congress. Now, they’re trying to do it through the courts and as they’ve been taught, leveraging crisis.

Saddled with a dog-face-pony-shell of a candidate this is hail-mary territory. Recent polling shows enthusiasm for the former Senator is predictably low.

It was against this backdrop and in this context that Wisconsin’s Democrat governor worked to move an election and expand mail-in balloting, by fiat.

In the end, this maneuvering failed, the election was held and predictably the Democrats picked up a seat on the Supreme Court. They won the battle, lost the war. It’s more likely that fighting abuse of power and a long view on good policy drove Republican action in Wisconsin, not suppression.

Read More

Texans have clarity on voting by mail

Posted by |

Don’t be confused by progressives trying to bum rush Texas elections or fake news irresponsibly published by the Houston Chronicle.

There have been no expansions to who can vote by mail. Texas law is clear, to vote by mail in Texas you need to:

be 65 years or older;

be disabled;

be out of the county on election day and during the period for early voting by personal appearance; or

be confined in jail, but otherwise eligible.

Suggesting that the Secretary of State (SoS) has introduced ambiguity to this list of qualified individuals is fake news promulgated by the Houston Chronicle.

Read More

Democrats Were Always Gonna Sue

Posted by |

They say the only sure things in life are death and taxes, Democrats suing should be added to the list.

On Friday, Governor Greg Abbott moved statewide run-off elections to July. The move had been anticipated and was telegraphed earlier in the day by Lt. Governor Dan Patrick on the Mark Davis radio show.

Ahead of the announcement, as we reported last week, Democrats had been maneuvering behind the scenes to keep the runoff in May but expand voting by mail to everyone in the state.

Conservative election integrity advocates warned against capitulating to Democrat demand to expand voting by mail on the basis that 1) it’s prone to fraud, 2) potentially unnecessary and 3) logistically impossible.

On that last count, there was agreement among both conservative and liberal political observers.

Democrats began calling for 100% mail-in ballotting a week before Abbott’s announcement. As soon as the rumors began to circulate, a few things happened.

The media worked to midwife pressure on Abbott, Republican lawmakers sent up trial balloons, and conservatives predicted Democrats would sue one way or another.

When it became clear Abbott would not be playing ball, Democrats filed the suit. If Abbott had expanded the runoffs to universal mail-in but not the general election, Democrats would have sued. See how this works?

In addition to the fact that Texans will have to emerge from their homes by June to have a functioning civilization, data about the spread of the Wuhan Coronavirus suggests that open spaces are not ideal circumstances for spread.

“If you have a COVID-19 patient in your household, your risk of developing the infection is about 10%….If you were casually exposed to the virus in the workplace (e.g., you were not locked up in conference room for six hours with someone who was infected [like a hospital]), your chance of infection is about 0.5%”

Dr. Paul Auwaerter, the Clinical Director for the Division of Infectious Diseases at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

The majority of viral infections come from prolonged exposures in confined spaces with other infected individuals. If this weren’t the case, grocery stores would be closed.

The lawsuit seeks to expand balloting by mail beyond what is allowed by Texas law. Texas laws should not be rewritten by activist jurists in Travis and Bexar county.

Texas Democrats are abusing the legal system to gain an advantage in the 2020 election that their candidates and ideas are incapable of delivering.

Which again brings us to the bailiwick, fear of lawsuits from Democrats should not drive legislative decision making.

This election cycle has proven that whatever the actions of the majority party, Democrats are going to go lawsuit-happy, no matter what.

Instead of moving public policy in a positive direction, the 2019 session was stagnant on important issues and in particular on election integrity. The next session can not be a repeat.

In the fog of war, it could have been tempting to cave and expand balloting by mail but that would be missing the forest for the trees.

Governor Abbott made the right call to move the primary to July and leave balloting by mail alone.

Democrat Request Should be Rejected

Posted by |

On Monday, Texas Democrats officially petitioned the Texas Secretary of State for universal mail-in balloting for spring elections.

The Democrat political maneuver, is thinly veiled in the interest of public health, was anticipated and should be rejected.

Local elections, low turnout affairs in their own right, and primary run-offs take place in early and late May respectively.

While it’s possible May elections will need to be rescheduled to allow more time for COVID19 to run its course, there is no good reason to require 100% balloting by mail or expanding voting by mail and ample reason against such a move.

As has been previously pointed out, balloting by mail is available to Texans over 65 and those with health conditions. These groups of individuals, considered high-risk to COVID19 are already protected from having to visit the voting booth.

There is no indication 100% ballot by mail would be a workable solution for election administrators and it would be prone to fraud. Mail-in votes are harvested every election cycle, depriving voters of their civil rights.

Read More

Pin It on Pinterest