Ross Kecseg with Empower Texans wrote a great piece about the structural challenges to cleaning up mail in ballot fraud. NO ONE has the job of ensuring mail in ballot integrity. Read his piece below:
Wednesday, Fort Worth, TX.
A jury delivered a guilty verdict in a case with statewide implications both in terms of legal precedent & revealing cracks within the election process.
On the seventh floor of the Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center, Rosa Maria Ortega was found guilty on two counts of illegal voting and sentenced to 8 years. The first count was for the 2012 general election. The second was the 2014 Republican Primary Runoff. Ortega had voted in both elections while ineligible. (Not a citizen)
The case against Attorney General Ken Paxton is complicated and nebulous at best.
The circumstances around the case are outright shady.
One of the questionable issues surrounding the case is the arrangement made with the special prosecutors just prior to Judge Oldner recusing himself from the case. Oldner entered into a pay structure agreement which is way beyond the Collin County rates, potentially leaving taxpayers on the hook for millions of dollars.
A Collin County taxpayer has sued challenging the ability to pay beyond the County’s rates, and this week the 5th Court of Appeals issued a stay in any further invoices to the special prosecutors pending the challenge to the pay structure.
This is a good thing for Collin County taxpayers. This is a good thing for process.
You can read more at the link below.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact Aaron Harris (682) 626-5679
3rd ELECTION COMPLAINT FILED WITH TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE BY DIRECT ACTION TEXAS
Direct Action Texas finds election irregularities in Harrison County Texas – files complaint with the Texas Secretary of State
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS (January 31, 2017) — Yesterday Direct Action Texas (DAT) filed a formal complaint with the Texas Secretary of State’s elections division regarding voting irregularities in Harrison County, Texas (Marshall, Texas). In a limited review of mail in ballots from various elections over the last calendar year, DAT found at least 42 election code violations. It is clear from the evidence that, similar to Tarrant County, there appears to be an illegal, mail in ballot harvesting operation in Harrison County. DAT has compiled the evidence through a variety of sources, including documents obtained via Open Record Requests. We have submitted the evidence in our formal complaint filed yesterday.
Over the last year, Direct Action Texas has filed two previous election violation complaints, one in Tarrant County and one in Hill County. The Hill County complaint has resulted in the impoundment of the March 1, 2016 Republican Primary ballots and associated equipment as well as an unprecedented recount as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, which occurred on November 9, 2016. The Tarrant County complaint has resulted in what has been described as the largest voter fraud investigation in Texas, as acknowledged by the Governor, Attorney General, and several news outlets. Both cases are still currently under investigation.
You can read more about the Tarrant County and Hill County cases at www.directactiontx.com
A top-ranking county official in one of Texas most conservative counties is facing harsh criticism for attempting to use his political position for personal gain.
Tarrant County Judge Glen Whitley recently pushed to improperly award a “no-bid” contract to a client of his government-accounting firm, Whitley-Penn.
During a November 8th, 2016 meeting of the Tarrant County Commissioner’s Court, Judge Whitley championed the idea of greater efficiency in county employee health care.
There was an urgent crisis and Whitley had the solution—pay $5,000 to a vendor, Integer Health Technologies, to study the county’s healthcare data. Then examine their findings and award Integer a $400,000-$500,000 annual contract.
The three County Commissioners present, along with several staffers, did not share Whitley’s enthusiasm for the deal.
Both Commissioners Johnson and Brooks were not pleased when It was later revealed that the initial cost rose by $12,000. Commissioner Brooks, a reliable ally of Whitley, stated, “I must admit that we’re not starting off real well going from a $5,000 expense to a $17,000 expense.”
Commissioner Nguyen firmly voiced concerns about fair bidding practices, as are required by state law. Awarding Integer the initial contract without seeking alternative bids would give them an “unfair competitive advantage” over another vendor who could later bid for the same contract.
Whitley and Integer attempted to improperly use an exception to avoid competitive bidding by claiming the company was the “sole source” for this technology. Sole source is a label applied to companies for which there is no competitor. But Integer is not the only company who offers this service.
Later in the meeting, Jack Beacham from the Purchasing Department expressed his desire to delay the deal and actually investigate Integer’s claims that they are sole-source. Whitley insisted this could be done after approving payment for the initial study. According to Whitley, Integer would eventually be proven to be the only provider, so the county should just go ahead with the deal.
Whitley had clearly not done his own due diligence, as Integer’s sole-source claims were false.
A compelling motive for Whitley oversight was later revealed. Integer is a client of Whitley-Penn, the public accounting firm of which Whitley is a partner. This is the typical back room deal cronyism that plagues politics. Integer gives its business to Whitley-Penn, and then, Whitley turns around and gives Tarrant County’s business to Integer.
If it were not for the insistence of Commissioner Nguyen for the investigation into the sole-source claims, along with questions raised by other commissioners, the Integer deal would have sailed through. Without citizens engaged, many do.
It raises several important questions: What other conflicts of interest exist between Whitley and his accounting firm, considering his firm is one of the largest in the state? How many similar deals get pushed through city councils and school boards every week?
It is imperative that we watch each and every official we elect to office. Choosing your candidate and voting is not enough. Citizens must hold their elected official accountable for each vote they cast.
The term “cronyism” is often used to describe back room dealing made between special interests and politicians in Washington D.C. or Austin. Yet cronyism happens at all levels of government, especially at the local level. For a recent example, look no further than Tarrant County.