Fighting for election integrity and transparency

13 Voter Fraud Indictments Handed Down in Edinburg

Posted by |

Yesterday, the Hidalgo County District Attorney confirmed that 13 indictments were handed down in Edinburg, Texas stemming from a voter fraud investigation following a local election in 2017.

In April, the Attorney General’s office reported that husband and wife Richard and Dalia Molina were arrested in connection with voter fraud allegations. Richard Molina won his 2017 mayoral bid by a 1200 vote margin, taking out a longtime incumbent.

Read More

Abbott’s Secretary of State Pick Worries Left

Posted by |

This week Governor Greg Abbott announced the appointment of Ruth Ruggero Hughs to Secretary of State, an appointment that comes nearly three months after the position was vacated. Hughs’ appointment appears to bug the left.

Abbott’s former appointee to the post, David Whitley resigned after the Senate refused to confirm his nomination, this despite the Governor and Whitely working to appease the rabid left. Opposition to Whitley and the administration of the Office of the Secretary of State during his tenure was pure political theater.

The theater was driven in large part by members of a more and more transparently agenda-driven media, which has been harassing Abbott to appoint a new secretary over the past several weeks.

This intervention of the media is not a departure from how they have handled Abbott and the secretary of state since January when it was announced that Texas county election officials were being tasked with confirming the eligibility of voters.

Read More

NBC Defends Illegal Voting

Posted by |

In a recent NBC Nightly News segment, host Lester Holt bemoaned the case of a Texas woman who was convicted of knowingly voting illegally and sentenced to prison.

The woman in question, Crystal Mason, was initially tried and convicted of tax fraud. As a tax preparation professional, she was accused of manipulating her client’s earnings to inflate return amounts. For her participation in the scheme, she was sentenced to prison and probation.

Read More

Stephanie Klick Can’t be Defended

Posted by |

Alan Vera has come out and tried to defend Chairman of the House Elections Committee Stephanie Klick for killing the marquee election integrity bill of the legislative session. It was a fool’s errand.

Below is a point by point rebuttal of his article published in the Texas Scorecard.

1. Paper ballots have been and can still be counterfeited/corrupted.

Vera misrepresents what was being called for in SB9 by suggesting that the paper ballot backups being produced in new electronic/paper systems would be easily counterfeited. This is not the case. In fact, it is the electronic ballots that have been and can still be corrupted. Many voters have little faith in the machines that can change votes with a premature spin of the wheel or not clicking a touchscreen in the exact spot. Holding that paper ballot, verifying the choices before feeding it into the scanner, improves voter confidence in the system. Votes are physical, real and there’s an electronic count to compare.

2. Paper ballots are susceptible to loss and corruption.

With 100% electronic systems, recounts and exposure of potential fraud are nearly impossible. There are no ballots to recount. Recounts will be easier with electronic/paper systems being implemented. In fact, several recounts have occurred in counties using these systems and each has come back exactly to the published results.  As for the storage of the ballots, the same can be said for the storage of flash drives and electronic information. Texans want physical ballots that can be physically recounted.

3. Paper ballots can be easily altered.

Paper ballots produced through the electronic/paper systems cannot be altered. The voter makes their selections on an electronic device that then prints their choices. There is no chance for wayward marks or tampering. The voter sees and verifies his/her choices and then runs the paper through the optical scanner. The paper ballot is not hand-marked bubbles but printed names with a barcode. 

4. Electronic ballots should be the final authority. 

Paper ballots are a tangible record verified by the voter. An electronic record is not. Voters trust the actual ballot record, not the electronic report. If the actual ballot record is different from the electronic record, the election results should change. That is the point of a recount.

5. The unreliability of optical scanners.

First of all, we challenge the assertion of the error rates of optical scanners. However, the error rates of electronic devices make the case for paper ballot backups. The option for a hand count remains when there are paper ballot backups.

Voter turnout increases when voters are confident in the security of elections. An overwhelming majority of Texans want paper ballot backups. The good news for Texans is paper ballot backups are coming in spite of Vera’s efforts.

As was written in an Autopsy Report published to the Texas Scorecard, SB9 was more than paper ballot backups and it’s why Direct Action Texas supported the measure even when that provision was lacking from the bill.

Special Interest Vera opposed the measure in the Senate because of the paper ballot backup provision.
Vera going to bat for Klick does her another disservice by bringing up the delay once the bill was passed by the Senate. First, Klick could and should have had a companion bill to Hughes’s SB9. That bill could have had her lobby-appeasing removal of paper ballot backups. The gutting of SB9 was unnecessarily delayed until April.

Vera, is a self-described “election consultant” as such, his aims and ends should be accurately interpreted as advocating for clients. Undisclosed clients constitute a conflict when lobbying the legislature as Vera has.

Arguing against Vera on the topic of voting system adoption isn’t really a fair fight. Vera is currently lobbying for electronic systems only, a position that may change.

Such a shift at a later date will be noted and drive the final nail in Vera’s coffin of credibility.

Right caves, left sues anyway

Posted by |

Surprise! Liberals are suing the State of Texas over election administration.

Being litigation fear mongers is a defining characteristic of the left and its completely predictable behavior ahead of a make or break 2020. It’s precisely because of this proclivity that legislative inaction in service of litigation avoidance by conservatives is played out, and should not have driven decision making during the session.

Last week, the Texas Civil Rights Project and a gaggle of its left-wing comrades, filed a lawsuit seeking to block election officials from throwing out mail-in ballots called into question during the signature verification process.

Read More

Pin It on Pinterest